mirror of
https://github.com/actions/cache.git
synced 2024-12-26 17:30:35 +01:00
Allow refreshing cache also with granular save.
This commit is contained in:
parent
06cf66871d
commit
351dc22c0c
8 changed files with 25995 additions and 32880 deletions
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import nock from "nock";
|
|||
|
||||
import { Events, Inputs, RefKey } from "../src/constants";
|
||||
import run from "../src/saveImpl";
|
||||
import { StateProvider } from "../src/stateProvider";
|
||||
import { NullStateProvider, StateProvider } from "../src/stateProvider";
|
||||
import * as actionUtils from "../src/utils/actionUtils";
|
||||
import * as testUtils from "../src/utils/testUtils";
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -502,6 +502,79 @@ test("save with cache hit and refresh-cache will try to delete and re-create ent
|
|||
expect(failedMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("Granular save will use lookup to determine if cache needs to be updated or (not) saved.", async () => {
|
||||
process.env["GITHUB_REPOSITORY"] = "owner/repo";
|
||||
process.env["GITHUB_TOKEN"] =
|
||||
"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";
|
||||
process.env["GITHUB_ACTION"] = "__owner___run-repo";
|
||||
|
||||
const infoMock = jest.spyOn(core, "info");
|
||||
const logWarningMock = jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "logWarning");
|
||||
const failedMock = jest.spyOn(core, "setFailed");
|
||||
|
||||
const primaryKey = testUtils.successCacheKey;
|
||||
|
||||
const inputPath = "node_modules";
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.Key, primaryKey);
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.RefreshCache, "true");
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.Path, inputPath);
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.UploadChunkSize, "4000000");
|
||||
|
||||
const restoreCacheMock = jest
|
||||
.spyOn(cache, "restoreCache")
|
||||
.mockImplementation(() => {
|
||||
return Promise.resolve(primaryKey);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const cacheId = 4;
|
||||
const saveCacheMock = jest
|
||||
.spyOn(cache, "saveCache")
|
||||
.mockImplementationOnce(() => {
|
||||
return Promise.resolve(cacheId);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await run(new NullStateProvider());
|
||||
|
||||
expect(restoreCacheMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
expect(restoreCacheMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
[inputPath],
|
||||
primaryKey,
|
||||
[],
|
||||
{
|
||||
lookupOnly: true
|
||||
},
|
||||
false
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(saveCacheMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
expect(saveCacheMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
[inputPath],
|
||||
primaryKey,
|
||||
{
|
||||
uploadChunkSize: 4000000
|
||||
},
|
||||
false
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(logWarningMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
|
||||
expect(infoMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(infoMock).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(
|
||||
1,
|
||||
`Cache hit occurred on the primary key ${primaryKey}, attempting to refresh the contents of the cache.`
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(infoMock).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(
|
||||
2,
|
||||
`Succesfully deleted cache with key: ${primaryKey}`
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(infoMock).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(
|
||||
3,
|
||||
`Cache saved with key: ${primaryKey}`
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(failedMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("save with cache hit and refresh-cache will throw a warning if there's no GITHUB_TOKEN", async () => {
|
||||
const logWarningMock = jest.spyOn(actionUtils, "logWarning");
|
||||
const failedMock = jest.spyOn(core, "setFailed");
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -111,6 +111,45 @@ test("save with valid inputs uploads a cache", async () => {
|
|||
expect(failedMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("Granular save with refreshCache is able to save cache", async () => {
|
||||
process.env["GITHUB_REPOSITORY"] = "owner/repo";
|
||||
process.env["GITHUB_TOKEN"] =
|
||||
"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";
|
||||
process.env["GITHUB_ACTION"] = "__owner___run-repo";
|
||||
const failedMock = jest.spyOn(core, "setFailed");
|
||||
|
||||
const primaryKey = "Linux-node-bb828da54c148048dd17899ba9fda624811cfb43";
|
||||
|
||||
const inputPath = "node_modules";
|
||||
process.env.CACHE_RESTORE_ONLY_MATCHED_KEY = primaryKey;
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.Key, primaryKey);
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.RefreshCache, "true");
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.Path, inputPath);
|
||||
testUtils.setInput(Inputs.UploadChunkSize, "4000000");
|
||||
|
||||
const cacheId = 4;
|
||||
|
||||
const saveCacheMock = jest
|
||||
.spyOn(cache, "saveCache")
|
||||
.mockImplementationOnce(() => {
|
||||
return Promise.resolve(cacheId);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await run();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(saveCacheMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
expect(saveCacheMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
[inputPath],
|
||||
primaryKey,
|
||||
{
|
||||
uploadChunkSize: 4000000
|
||||
},
|
||||
false
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(failedMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("save failing logs the warning message", async () => {
|
||||
const warningMock = jest.spyOn(core, "warning");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
14876
dist/restore-only/index.js
vendored
14876
dist/restore-only/index.js
vendored
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
14632
dist/restore/index.js
vendored
14632
dist/restore/index.js
vendored
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
14634
dist/save-only/index.js
vendored
14634
dist/save-only/index.js
vendored
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
14598
dist/save/index.js
vendored
14598
dist/save/index.js
vendored
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ async function restoreImpl(
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
core.info(`Cache restored from key: ${cacheKey}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return cacheKey;
|
||||
} catch (error: unknown) {
|
||||
core.setFailed((error as Error).message);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -42,10 +42,26 @@ async function saveImpl(stateProvider: IStateProvider): Promise<number | void> {
|
|||
{ required: false }
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// If matched restore key is same as primary key, either try to refresh the cache, or just notify and do not save (NO-OP in case of SaveOnly action)
|
||||
// If matched restore key is same as primary key, either try to refresh the cache, or just notify and do not save.
|
||||
|
||||
const restoredKey = stateProvider.getCacheState();
|
||||
let restoredKey = stateProvider.getCacheState();
|
||||
|
||||
if (refreshCache && !restoredKey) {
|
||||
// If getCacheState didn't give us a key, we're likely using granular actions. Do a lookup to see if we need to refresh or just do a regular save.
|
||||
const cachePaths = utils.getInputAsArray(Inputs.Path, {
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
const enableCrossOsArchive = utils.getInputAsBool(
|
||||
Inputs.EnableCrossOsArchive
|
||||
);
|
||||
restoredKey = await cache.restoreCache(
|
||||
cachePaths,
|
||||
primaryKey,
|
||||
[],
|
||||
{ lookupOnly: true },
|
||||
enableCrossOsArchive
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (utils.isExactKeyMatch(primaryKey, restoredKey)) {
|
||||
const { GITHUB_TOKEN, GITHUB_REPOSITORY } = process.env || null;
|
||||
if (GITHUB_TOKEN && GITHUB_REPOSITORY && refreshCache === true) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue