This was a TODO item:
- 07cbae66a4/src/js/cosmetic-filtering.js (L375)
µBlock.staticExtFilteringEngine.HostnameBasedDB has been
re-factored to accomodate the storing of specific cosmetic
filters.
As a result of this refactoring:
- Memory usage has been further decreased
- Performance of selector retrieval marginally
improved
- New internal representation opens the door
to use a specialized version of HNTrie, which
should further improve performance/memory
usage
Performance-related work: the logger data has been decoupled
from the DOM -- inspired from CodeMirror's way of efficiently
handling large amout of text data.
This decoupling now makes the logger highly efficient CPU- and
memory-wise, and open the way to more possibilities.
Ability to configure some aspect of the logger behavior and
visuals:
- The hard-coded limit of 5000 entries has been
removed and is now replaced with a variety of
user-configurable settings to enforce the discarding of
logger entries.
- Some columns in the logger output can now be hidden.
The filter list look-up feature has been merged into the
existing overlay dialog used to create URL rules or static
filters, as an entry in a new "Details" pane.
Other issues addressed during refactoring:
- https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/280
- https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/1999
The minimum version supported on Firefox has been bumped
up to 55.0.
- Avoid concatenating with empty array: though the concatenated
array is empty, this still forces the creation of a whole new
array as per semantic of Array.prototype.concat().
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/concat>
- Do not convert arrays to strings when sending data to
main process in surveyPhase1(): I no longer see any benefit
doing so in profiling data (if I recall properly this was
benefiting Firefox, but I can't remember for sure anymore why
I chose to do so back then).
Related issue:
- https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/3683
This commit further increases uBO's procedural cosmetic filters
Adguard's cosmetic filter syntax -- specifically those procedural
cosmetic filters where plain CSS selectors appeared following
a procedural oeprator (this was rejected as invalid by uBO).
Also, experimental support for `:watch-attrs` procedural
operator, as discussed in <https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/341#issuecomment-449765525>.
Support may be dropped before next release depending on whether
a better solution is suggested.
Additionally, the usual opportunistic refactoring toward ES6
syntax.
potentially causing high-generic cosmetic filters to not be applied
because the MRU cache contains an empty list of high-generic filters
when there is a query from a content script for cosmetic filters
before they are fully loaded and ready.
- collate together specific filters with same base domain
- replace string-based hash to integer-based hash
- revisit code to benefit from ES6-specific syntax
A new filtering class has been created: "static extended filtering".
This new class is an umbrella class for more specialized filtering
engines:
- Cosmetic filtering
- Scriptlet filtering
- HTML filtering
HTML filtering is available only on platforms which support modifying
the response body on the fly, so only Firefox 57+ at the moment.
With the ability to modify the response body, HTML filtering has
been introduced: removing elements from the DOM before the source
data has been parsed by the browser.
A consequence of HTML filtering ability is to bring back script tag
filtering feature.
