Table of Contents
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This page is just a place for me to keep track of comparative memory usage over time. Screenshot before/after reference benchmark. The memory was garbage collected before taking the screenshots. Forcing memory garbage collection occurred by leaving the browser idle for more than 1 minute, then the dev console of each extension opened, Timeline tab, then clicked twice on the trash can icon.
23 December 2014
- Chromium 39.0.2171.65 64-bit (Linux)
- uBlock Origin (uBO) 0.8.2.2
- AdBlock 2.15
- Adblock Plus (ABP) 1.8.8
- Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8
Observations during benchmark:
- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. uBO consistently shows at most low single-digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range.
Settings:
- uBO 0.8.2.2: EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Peter Lowe's, Fanboy’s Social Blocking List, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (less memory churning at launch).
- AdBlock 2.15: AdBlock custom filters, EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Peter Lowe's, Fanboy’s Social Blocking List, Malware protection.
- ABP 1.8.5: EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Peter Lowe's, Fanboy’s Social Blocking List, Malware Domains. Acceptable ads disabled.
- Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8: English filters, Spyware filter, Peter Lowe's, Social media filter, Phishing and malware protection. Allow acceptable ads disabled.
- Browser's Click-to-play enabled
- Browser's Block third-party cookies and site data checked
Notes:
- Users should mind privacy issues raised when enabling AdGuard's Malware/phishing protection.
18 September 2014
- Chromium 37.0.2062.94 64-bit (Linux)
- uBO v 0.6.2.1
- AdBlock 2.7.13
- ABP 1.8.5
- Ghostery 5.4.0
- Disconnect 5.18.15
Observations during benchmark:
- AdBlock is very CPU intensive. ABP also, although to a lesser degree compared to AdBlock.
Settings:
- uBO v 0.6.2.1: EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Peter Lowe's, Fanboy’s Social Blocking List, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (less memory churning at launch).
- AdBlock 2.7.13: AdBlock custom filters, EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Fanboy’s Social Blocking List, Malware protection.
- ABP 1.8.5: EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Fanboy’s Social Blocking List, Malware Domains. Acceptable ads disabled.
- Ghostery 5.4.0: Blocking all trackers. Ghostrank not selected. Alert bubble disabled.
- Disconnect 5.18.15: Default settings.
Notes:
I chose not to benchmark AdGuard, because of the privacy issues when enabling Malware/phishing protection.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
- Wiki home
- About the Wiki documentation
- Permissions
- Privacy policy
- Info:
- The toolbar icon
- The popup user interface
- The context menu
- Dashboard
- Settings pane
- Filter lists pane
- My filters pane
- My rules pane
- Trusted sites pane
- Keyboard shortcuts
- The logger
- Element picker
- Element zapper
- Blocking mode
- Very easy mode
- Easy mode (default)
- Medium mode (optimal for advanced users)
- Hard mode
- Nightmare mode
- Strict blocking
- Few words about re-design of uBO's user interface
- Reference answers to various topics seen in the wild
- Overview of uBlock's network filtering engine
- Overview of uBlock's network filtering engine: details
- Does uBlock Origin block ads or just hide them?
- Doesn't uBlock Origin add overhead to page load?
- About "Why uBlock Origin works so much better than Pi‑hole does?"
- uBlock's blocking and protection effectiveness:
- uBlock's resource usage and efficiency:
- Memory footprint: what happens inside uBlock after installation
- uBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared
- Counterpoint: Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB RAM and|or a quad core CPU
- Debunking "uBlock Origin is less efficient than Adguard" claims
- Myth: uBlock consumes over 80MB
- Myth: uBlock is just slightly less resource intensive than Adblock Plus
- Myth: uBlock consumes several or several dozen GB of RAM
- Various videos showing side by side comparison of the load speed of complex sites
- Own memory usage: benchmarks over time
- Contributed memory usage: benchmarks over time
- Can uBO crash a browser?
- Tools, tests
- Deploying uBlock Origin
- Proposal for integration/unit testing
- uBlock Origin Core (Node.js):
- Troubleshooting:
- Good external guides:
- Scientific papers
uBlock Origin - An efficient blocker for Chromium and Firefox. Fast and lean.